All three of the likely presidential candidates have recently made a comment that goes something like..."I am going to lead in the White House, not manage!" Is anyone else worried about the kind of rhetoric that paints leadership as purely about vision and enrollment, leaving the domain of actually getting work done to management? Why do we have to polarize task and relationship by vilifying one and canonizing the other?
Share this post
Polarizing Leadership in Presidential Debates
Share this post
All three of the likely presidential candidates have recently made a comment that goes something like..."I am going to lead in the White House, not manage!" Is anyone else worried about the kind of rhetoric that paints leadership as purely about vision and enrollment, leaving the domain of actually getting work done to management? Why do we have to polarize task and relationship by vilifying one and canonizing the other?